Endometrial ablation has advantages over hysterectomy for heavy menstruation


Last Updated: 2011-06-20 12:20:19 -0400 (Reuters Health)

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - When women need treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding, endometrial ablation is less likely than hysterectomy to be followed later by pelvic floor repair or surgery for urinary incontinence, a Scottish study indicates.

Using population-based data, Dr. S. Bhattacharya of the University of Aberdeen and colleagues examined the risk of further surgery in more than 51,000 women who had either an endometrial ablative procedure (n = 14,078) or a hysterectomy (n = 37,120) as a primary surgical treatment for dysfunctional uterine bleeding, over an 18-year period.

As they report in BJOG online May 31, 2779 women in the endometrial ablation group (19.7%) went on to have a hysterectomy, while another 962 had repeat ablation or a non-ablative procedure.

But women in the ablation group were less likely to require pelvic floor repair (hazard ratio 0.62) or tension-free vaginal tape surgery for stress urinary incontinence (HR 0.55) compared to women whose primary treatment was hysterectomy.

Results also showed that compared to vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent pelvic floor repair (HR 0.54).

The findings may be used to counsel women about surgical options for treating heavy menstrual bleeding, Dr. Bhattacharya and colleagues conclude.

"The lower peri-operative complications of the less invasive ablation procedures need to be balanced against the fact that around one-quarter will require further surgery for the same symptoms" they advise. "The risk of long-term pelvic floor and stress incontinence problems may be less, however."

SOURCE:http://bit.ly/kvhQEI

BJOG 2011.



© 2010 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS!
We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the HON Foundation. Click to verify.